[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: additional thoughts about the new packages



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Raphael Hertzog, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>In fact, i'm not really convinced that we need all this crap. The simplest
>solution may be to remove the conflicts (and only the conflicts) between
>perl-5.005 and Data::Dumper until the transition to perl-5.005 has been
>completed. This way Data::Dumper will still be available for the
>old perls (perl_5.004.04 and perl-5.004) and it will be removed when it
>will be of no use for any package (ie when you'll add the conflict
>in perl-5.005).

This is probably the best solution.  If we allow people to leave
perl-5.004 installed, we can't add this conflict.  People need to be
able to have perl-5.004 installed if they have 1.85 Berkeley db
databases.

>> - From looking at the code, the only way that I could see that happening
>> would be if the incpush line we've add for Debian has addsubdirs =
>> TRUE.  You said you were compiling it yourself, could you check that?
>
>I've compiled it myself but I used your .orig.tar.gz (from 2 weeks) and
>your *-0.8.diff.gz. And I do not have anything in perl.c that may explain
>what I get :

Nope.  I don't see anything either.  Could you try downloading the
package and see if you still get the same thing?

Darren
- -- 
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI/Pilot programmer/tutor @
@		     Make a little hot-tub in your soul.		      @

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBN3M7XY4wrq++1Ls5AQE7YgQAiOZOIIik5OhwjwclrKv3xGbEMQJNWaMn
nzOewa+1QNcvzkz7kHbAGua6GSXrPbrZSiPLkyxaYfZLv54UftB04LTy2L6xZoaa
jt9XNoPIGiPj+KRFd680vUzAtHZhP3III+I6KOwfjAqZcibTOo/eaDTsfnnGptky
F0b7yeKpFMA=
=h6Lh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: