Hi, Drew Parsons wrote: > Oh OK. But what does "won't work" mean? > > If OOo1 crashes at start up because the OOo2 thesaurus is installed, or > vice versa, then the strong conflict makes sense. That indeed is the case. > But if "won't work" simply means the OOo1 thesaurus function doesn't do > it's job properly because the installed thesaurus is OOo2, then the > Conflict is too strong. I would disagree.. > something, who can say?). You don't need the OOo1 thesaurus for that, > since the document is already written, but you do want other parts of > OOo1. Is OOo1 really going to crash because it doesn't have a usable > thesaurus? Uh, the stuff *is* parallel installable currently. Just not the thesauri... > Alternatively, if the source of the conflict > is /etc/openoffice/dictionary.lst, then would it be a bad idea to have > OOo2 to use /etc/openoffice2/, instead? Seems like this would help > simultaneous installation a lot, and it's done that way at the level > of /usr/lib. See the archive of debian-openoffice where I said why I didn't do that. Regards, Rene
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature