Le ven 22/08/2003 à 04:50, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > Hi, > > Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > First, during the upgrade, my old /etc/openoffice1.1 directory was not > > deleted. I guess I have not made a --purge to delete it, but I'm > > wondering if it would anyway. > > Hmm. I wonder if we are _allowed_ to touch them. Strictly speaking are > they conffiles of other packages which policy forbids to touch... I know, but openoffice1.1 should then remove it when uninstalled for a future version. Which is a problem, because it does not for the moment, and we are not uploading a new version just therefore... > > > Second, my openoffice.conf is executable. Is this still the case in the > > upcoming version? > > $ ls -l /etc/openoffice/openoffice.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 2003-08-21 15:22 > /etc/openoffice/openoffice.conf > > Hmm. Maybe something remaining from previous openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.x? > > My dictionary.lst is only "rw" for root. Is it meant to be that way? It > > also means nobody else than root can check the installed dictionaries. > > it should be -rw-r--r-- (644), so all people could check the installed > dictionaries. In fact this permissions are set by > update-openoffice-dicts: For the moment, on my system at least, nobody except root can check which dictionaries are installed in dictionary.lst. > --- snip --- > # make sure the file has the right permissions > chown(0, 0, $dictlist_orig); > chmod(0644, $dictlist_orig); > --- snip --- > > Systemwide installations have to be made from root anyways, so... > > > The sofficerc contains variables without explanations. Where could we > > find it and could we add a few lines explaning each one? I volunteer to > > do it if I'm pointed to the place to find more info. > > $ cat /etc/openoffice/sofficerc > [Bootstrap] > Logo=1 > > Hmm. What is on Logo=0 (Splashscreen off) and Logo=1 (Splashscreen on) > not clear? :) I meant openoffice.conf, off course, with the envvarrs being defined (and currently commented). > > Grüße/Regards, > > René -- Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=