openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 built wrong???

[Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>]

Jan,
   Since the debian gcc maintainers are in the process of removing
gcc 3.1 from sid, I decided to purge it manually off of my machine
and was shocked to see the following...

bogus:/home# apt-get remove cpp-3.1  cpp-3.1-doc g77-3.1-doc  gcc-3.1-base  gcc-3.1-doc gij-3.1 gnat-3.1-doc libstdc++4  libstdc++4-doc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  cpp-3.1 cpp-3.1-doc g77-3.1-doc gcc-3.1-base gcc-3.1-doc gij-3.1
  gnat-3.1-doc libstdc++4 libstdc++4-doc openoffice.org openoffice.org-bin
  openoffice.org-l10n-en 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 12 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 177MB will be freed.

This if for...

ii  openoffice.org 1.0.1-5        high-quality office productivi
ii  openoffice.org 1.0.1-5        OpenOffice.org office suite bi
ii  openoffice.org 1.0.1-5        english_us language package fo

which according to the changelog.Debian.gz...

  * Move to gcc 3.2 for both architectures

So this doesn't make any sense at all. It would appear that openoffice.org
1.0.1-5 is in fact NOT built against gcc 3.2 as claimed. Either than
or you are dragging around an incorrect Depends in your debian/control.
Either way can we have a 1.0.1-6 rebuild with this resolved?
                                    Jack