[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 built wrong???



Hi,

Jack Howarth wrote:
>    Since the debian gcc maintainers are in the process of removing
> gcc 3.1 from sid, I decided to purge it manually off of my machine
> and was shocked to see the following...
> 
> bogus:/home# apt-get remove cpp-3.1  cpp-3.1-doc g77-3.1-doc  gcc-3.1-base  gcc-3.1-doc gij-3.1 gnat-3.1-doc libstdc++4  libstdc++4-doc
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>   cpp-3.1 cpp-3.1-doc g77-3.1-doc gcc-3.1-base gcc-3.1-doc gij-3.1
>   gnat-3.1-doc libstdc++4 libstdc++4-doc openoffice.org openoffice.org-bin
>   openoffice.org-l10n-en 
[...]
> which according to the changelog.Debian.gz...
> 
>   * Move to gcc 3.2 for both architectures
> 
> So this doesn't make any sense at all. It would appear that openoffice.org
> 1.0.1-5 is in fact NOT built against gcc 3.2 as claimed. Either than
> or you are dragging around an incorrect Depends in your debian/control.

It is build with gcc-3.2.

Unfortunately, we had some problems with earlier packages and we
hardcoded the libstdc++ dependency in the package in this time (at
this time 3.1 was what we've used)

We forgot to remove that.

It is fixed in CVS....

Regards,

Rene
-- 
  .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer             
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ 
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Attachment: pgpRDn7w39ATr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: