Re: Should we fill RFP against all sort of interesting ocaml stuff ?

["Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>]

Hello,

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:14:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe we could use this TODO + Policy to create a small website for
> > pkg-ocaml-maint ?
> > 
> > I will put ant in TODO ( i also agree that it looks interesting ).
> > 
> > Anyway, if no one wants to do it, we still keep it in mind.
> 
> Maybe we could use a field in the TODO for denoting interestting but not
> quite ready pieces of software.
> 
> Friendly,
> 
> Sven Luther
> 
> 

I agree on this kind of field : 
type upstreamState =
EarlyDeveloppement 
| TestPhase 
| PreRelease 
| StableRelease

type pkgOcamlMaintState =
NoOneInterstedIn
| PollDeveloppement 
| FirstContact 
| UpstreamAgreement
| Packaging
| Upload

;->

I think it could be a good way to categorize things. Maybe it is totally
useless also ;->

Regard
Sylvain LE GALL