Re: Should we fill RFP against all sort of interesting ocaml stuff ?
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> *****************
> Not interesting :
> *****************
> Package: ant-ocaml
> URL: http://www-mgi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~blume/Download.html
> Authors:
> Description: Typesetting system inspired by TeX
Hey, ant is great, i almost did package it myself. It is not all that
mature yet, but it may in the future, combined with advi, make for a
killer presentation tool.
And we can now add these two, altough i don't know in which category
they should go :
Package: mod_caml
Version: O.8
URL: https://savannah.nongnu.org/files/?group=modcaml
URL: http://www.merjis.com/developers/mod_caml/
Author: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Description: a set of Objective CAML (OCaml) bindings for the Apache API
mod_caml is a set of Objective CAML (OCaml) bindings for the Apache
API. It allows you to run CGI scripts written in OCaml directly inside
the Apache webserver. However, it is much much more than just that:
.
* Bind to any part of the Apache request cycle.
* Read and modify internal Apache structures.
* Share modules of code between handlers and scripts.
* CGI library and templating system (allows separation of code and presentation).
* Works with Apache 1.3 and Apache 2.0.
Package: CamlTemplate
Version: O.5
URL: http://saucecode.org/camltemplate
Author: Benjamin Geer <ben@socialtools.net>
Description: a small template processor library for Objective Caml
It can be used to generate web pages, scripts, SQL queries, XML
documents and other sorts of text files. Features:
.
* A versatile, easy-to-learn template syntax that supports
common scripting-language constructs, while encouraging a
separation between presentation logic and application logic.
* The supported Caml data structures accomodate lists, tables
and trees of items in a straightforward manner.
* Works well with mod_caml.
* Supports any ASCII-compatible encoding, including UTF-8.
* Optional support for multithreading.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: