Re: About Cameleon
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 09:37:00AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
>> What do you think about this ?
>
> I'm back (finally this time :) from vacation and I'm just reading the
> thread about cameleon.
>
> Regarding one or more package I am for the one-tarball-multiple-binary
> packages and additionally I suggest to create a dummy package that
> depends on all the cameleon stuff.
I was annoyed because some parts of it are already been packaged
by you: zoggy and configwin.
> Regarding leaving all in my hands ... errm ... boh :-)
>
> I built the zoggy package some times ago because I thought that we
> really needed a gtk interface designer and the configwin package came
> from a build dep of zoggy.
>
> Currently I now nothing about the other components of cameleon you are
> talking about and so I doubt is a good idea for me to maintain them.
Well, I was interested in Epeire and it requires two other components.
> If you can take over the whole cameleon affair I will be happy,
> otherwise we can study how to coordinate a co-maintainership on it. If
Ok, I'll work on it as soon as its final version come out.
> you are in lack of time or if you prefer not to work in the cameleon
> affair I can take over the project _BUT_ consider that currently my
> precedence will be for the 3.04 -> 3.06 transition [1].
Have fun!
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
Reply to: