[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DM team: Delegation update requested

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:09:49PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> [ As a courtesy, I am explicitly CC'ing anibal. ]
> On 02/05/2016 20:21, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Also, the delegation should be IMO renamed, as we have changed the DM
> > handling since its inception. The DM team currently serves in a
> > fashion more similar to that of the NM front desk; we (the
> > keyring-maint team) are the keyring maintainers for DM as well.
> >
> The consensus reached with NM Frontdesk is that no delegation is needed
> for the assigned tasks. I agree that this is also applicable to the
> Newmaint team. But I will not de-delegate Newmaint if they feel a
> delegation is still needed (If that's the case, I'd be interested to
> know why though) and would like to hear Anibal's opinion before taking a
> decision.
> Another option would be to welcome Anibal in the Keyring maint team,
> which could also make sense and would give him more autonomy. What do
> you think?

In general we've tried to keep the roles responsible for deciding which
keys should go into the keyring separate from the management of the
keyring; while keyring-maint has taken over the addition of DM keys to
the keyring we have never engaged in processing DM applications or
making the decisions around accepting them.


... Are you happy with your wash?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: