On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:09:49PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > [ As a courtesy, I am explicitly CC'ing anibal. ] > > On 02/05/2016 20:21, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Also, the delegation should be IMO renamed, as we have changed the DM > > handling since its inception. The DM team currently serves in a > > fashion more similar to that of the NM front desk; we (the > > keyring-maint team) are the keyring maintainers for DM as well. > > > The consensus reached with NM Frontdesk is that no delegation is needed > for the assigned tasks. I agree that this is also applicable to the > Newmaint team. But I will not de-delegate Newmaint if they feel a > delegation is still needed (If that's the case, I'd be interested to > know why though) and would like to hear Anibal's opinion before taking a > decision. > > Another option would be to welcome Anibal in the Keyring maint team, > which could also make sense and would give him more autonomy. What do > you think? In general we've tried to keep the roles responsible for deciding which keys should go into the keyring separate from the management of the keyring; while keyring-maint has taken over the addition of DM keys to the keyring we have never engaged in processing DM applications or making the decisions around accepting them. J. -- ... Are you happy with your wash?
Description: Digital signature