Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

To: debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:17:03 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 4FC60FBF.9030104@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120529151011.GA3350@jwilk.net>
References: <[🔎] 20120529110640.GA17414@enricozini.org> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1205291220270.13143@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] 4FC4C261.4010906@dogguy.org> <[🔎] 20120529124130.GA4742@jwilk.net> <[🔎] 20120529145748.GA25702@enricozini.org> <[🔎] 20120529151011.GA3350@jwilk.net>

On 05/29/2012 11:10 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> for people who are not okay with running untrusted [...] code on their
> machines. 
So, do you consider nm.debian.org as untrusted?

Thomas

Reply to:

References:
- bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
  - From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
  - From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
  - From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
Next by Date: Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
Previous by thread: Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
Next by thread: Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread