On 17-Feb-2010, martin f krafft wrote: > I am in a difficult situation because all of my conduct with Ben has > been positive, but I received a lot of backlash over my decision to > advocate him. Thank you, Martin, for your efforts and diligence in considering this matter. > Given the feedback (and shit) I received in response to my > advocation, I have sought and read much of what Ben has contributed > to Debian, leaving me with the following conclusion: I would like to receive (privately is fine) specific references to instances of what these are, so I know what it is that needs to be addressed. > - It is true that not all his packages are in an excellent state, > which one might expect from someone applying for membership. Which packages are not currently in an excellent state? Are there any which are not currently awaiting a sponsor to upload a new release I've made to address the problems? > - His style of communication seems to rub some people strongly who > have much credit to their name from their contributions in Debian. > I suggest for Ben to take a lesson from that This, in particular, I would like specific references for so I know what people are objecting to. > At this point I would like to thank everyone who took the time to > write in privately. Ditto. Thank you for working with Martin to help him assess my application. > and I recommend he address these publicly voiced concerns before > applying again. I look forward to knowing what, specifically, they are :-) > Sorry for my mistake, and the extra work it has caused you. Thank for taking the time to put this together. -- \ “If I melt dry ice, can I swim without getting wet?” —Steven | `\ Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature