Re: Reforming the NM process

To: debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Reforming the NM process
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:04:51 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060416180451.GE496@df7cb.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87lkuak0et.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca>
References: <[🔎] 871ww4awvx.fsf@nahar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <[🔎] 20060411203455.GB5156@workaround.org> <[🔎] 87lkuak0et.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca>

Re: Hubert Chan 2006-04-12 <[🔎] 87lkuak0et.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca>
> Maybe we need a debian-am-mentors system for AMs, like we have
> debian-mentors for maintainers, for when AMs have questions about AM
> tasks.

That's what debian-newmaint@ldo and #debian-newmaint (oftc) are meant
for.

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reforming the NM process
  - From: Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca>

References:
- Reforming the NM process
  - From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
- Re: Reforming the NM process
  - From: Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>
- Re: Reforming the NM process
  - From: Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca>

Prev by Date: Alejandro Ríos on hold
Next by Date: Re: Reforming the NM process
Previous by thread: Re: Reforming the NM process
Next by thread: Re: Reforming the NM process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread