[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD

On Sat, 07 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 07:21 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > into a full screening, since as Marc Brockschmidt indicated, one FD
> > > check can take about two hours. If you spend that much time you can be
> > > pretty certain you did a thorough check on the person, and the DAM
> > 
> > I may be wrong here, but I have a hunch that your definition of through
> > check is unlikely to meet the DAM's.  Heck, it doesn't meet even _mine_
> > while I was working as an AM!  It is more like eight to ten hours of work
> > per applicant.  Not to mention the other eight hours of work it can take to
> > make a proper AM report...
> We're talking about the Front Desk check which is performed *after* the
> checking that the Application Manager does.

Exactly. And, please correct me if I got it wrong, you were arguing that the
FD check done after the AM report is good enough for the DAM to just have a
cursory glance over the report before approving it.  And that "two hours" is
a through check.

I don't agree with either idea.  Where's the incongruency?

  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Reply to: