On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:28:08AM -0700, Troy Heber wrote: > On 11/14/05 11:10, Martin Wuertele wrote: > > It's not a FIFO queue, it's up to the DAM to decide in what order he > > processes the applicants. The same applies for the FD queue: they try to > > match applicants with suitable AMs. This is nothing personal it might > > take longer to go through all of the correspondence for one applicant > > than it takes for another one. Please be patient, I'm sure your > > application will be processed soon. > I understand why there are differences in AM assignment and the FD > queue. However, the process is pretty broken if someone can be waiting > in the DAM queue, this mean having completed everything ask of them > already, another NM *applies* for NM and still manages pass through > first. Let me reiterate he applied for NM after I was sitting in the > DAM queue! This is so disproportional that it does not make sense. > This is a perfect example of why people get so frustrated with the NM > process. In reality the NM process is not a process because it is > non-deterministic. As you say, "it's up to the DAM to decide". Well, to give people the benefit of the doubt, it may be that Joerg *has* worked on your application several times, but has repeatedly gotten to a sticking point which required another round of correspondence with your AM? Have you talked to your AM to see whether this is the case? I do note that https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=troy.heber@hp.com shows a "time of last action" in September; so indeed, it doesn't look as though you're being repeatedly passed over, but that *something* is happening -- just not the something you're looking for yet. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature