* Michael Banck (mbanck@debian.org) wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:09:49AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > As for who you'd need to hear from regarding Debian's 'official' > > position, I'm guessing that'd either be tbm or the Tech Committee. I > > did send a mail to the tech committee a couple years back but as I > > recall they kind of agreed it was good but didn't really take much of a > > stand on it in Debian. A fresh thread about it might stir them up a bit > > considering I think the problems with the lack of versioning have become > > more apparent as we've grown. > > That looks like a worthwhile cause to wake up the tech-ctte and see > whether it is still operational. Would you be willing to do this? Sure, I'll bring it up again. It'll be a day or two, I want to go back and re-read the thread on it and have some discussion with the folks doing the libtool patch. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature