[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org: This DAM aprovall thing is getting really weird]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:30:04AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> RISKO Gergely wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > If at least someone gave me a reason for this I could understand, but
> > I guess it will be like the gpg key: if I hadn't asked you, and you
> > the DAM, I would still be blissfully ignorant on why the delay.
> > 

This is the first message that I can see, even though it's an Re. ...,
I'll look in the other groups better (or maybe it is an Re from

Just to say that what is really bothering me in all this is the
uncertainity and lack of feedback; I fully understand the workload of
the DAM and I never said anything less proper about his work, it's
just that when ppl that have been on hold at DAM stage for months see
ppl that have applied after they had already reached the DAM stage
become a Developer... it just feels weird after a time. I'm sure there
are many mathematical explanations for this, but in the end one is
left in a situation were nothing else can be done; all the other
stages have specific things that one can do to either pass, fail and
correct things.

In any event I wouldn't like to make my specific case a matter of
tension between Debian Developers.

Best Regards,


Frederico S. Mu?oz		GNU	http://www.gnu.org
fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org	Debian	http://www.debian.org

http://sdf.lonestar.org - SDF Public Access Unix Systems

Attachment: pgpB04l7x5CYf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: