[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: reasons for split of libavcodec54 and libavcodec-extra-54, missing codecs and a metapackage.



Quoting Nicolas George (2014-11-19 13:48:14)
> Le nonidi 29 brumaire, an CCXXIII, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> Possibly we can simplify even further:
>> 
>>   * Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra
>>     (i.e. non-versioned name of itself)
>>   * Let GPLv2 packages conflict against libavcodec-extra (i.e. not 
>>     replace but complement existing suggests/recommends/depends).
>> 
>> How does that sound?
>
> I think this discussion has lost something from view:
>
> It is perfectly legal and compatible with the license to USE a GPLv2 
> program with a GPLv3 shared library or the other way around. Licenses 
> can only control distribution, not use, and the GPL does not try to do 
> so.
> 
> Therefore, I do not believe this kind of conflict is in the users' 
> best interest.

Good point.

How do you then find my above post, replacing "conflict" with 
"build-conflict"?


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: