Re: jack 0.94.0-2
>>>>> "rj" == Robert Joerdens <robertjo@phys.ethz.ch> writes:
>> I ask this because I'd like the differences between Debian and
>> DeMuDi package sets to be as few as possible, hopefully nearly
>> anything.
rj> As someone else already pointed out: that would be "hardly
rj> anything". ;-]
Ooops, I should stamp it over my skin :)
>> AFAIR a separate jack package was introduced in AGNULA/DeMuDi
>> at some point, because we wanted to have a more recent jack
>> version than the one officially provided by Debian. I think now
>> jack has become more stable and usable, and maybe it's not so
>> critical anymore to upgrade to a new release as soon as
>> possible.
rj> You could have tried with the version(s) that was (were) in
rj> experimental for quite some time: 0.80.0 was uploaded to
rj> experimental 06-10-2003.
Probably we missed it :/. I hope such things won't happen again, as
it's only bare duplication of work..
>> Thus, if the jack version is not going to change for a while, I
>> think we can drop our separate jack package and adopt the
>> Debian one. This would solve the annoying issue of having
>> different builds for the same package version, any package can
>> be uploaded both to Debian and DeMuDi.
>>
>> Yes that's correct, and this a good news. Anyhow my intention
>> is to shift forward the unstable snapshot which DeMuDi is base
>> on and to upstream upgrade most of the applications I've
>> packaged, building them against debian's 0.94.0 and uploading
>> the packages both to Debian and DeMuDi.
rj> That seems very reasonable.
Ok, I'll let everybody here to be fully informed on this.
bye,
free
Reply to: