[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: i386 and AMD architectures in debian/control was Re: Building a prospective 32 bit package on 64 bits.



On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> > > Running a AMD architecture Debian I run programs built for i386
> > > without
> > > giving it much thought.
> > > 
> > > Is it sufficient if an i386 package builds and tests properly on an
> > > AMD
> > > buster, or is it mandatory to
> > > install a i386 buster for testing?
> > Most our packages work on all architectures.
> 
> Sure but this question is about a package that is for one architecture only.
> 
> Let me phrase it more bluntly.
> I've a package for i386. 1) The reason is clear and unadvoidable.
> Its source is i386 assembler.
> 
> The question is:
> 
> It will run on an AMD architecture too (as is confirmed by a test.)
The architecture is called amd64. It's not about the CPU vendor.

> and I want the package to be installable on an AMD architecture.
> 
> Can/Should I add the architecture AMD in debian/control to achieve
> this? Is this maybe unnecessary?
If the package contains i386 binaries its architecture should be i386.
i386 packages are installable on amd64 if dpkg is configured to do soo.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: