Bug#897102: libexif-gtk/0.4.0-2
On 2018-04-29 Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmaster@outlook.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 April 2018 10:11 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > 0.4.0-1 says "Switch to LGPL-2.1+ for libexif-gtk 0.4.0.". Is this
> > correct? While COPYING contains a copy of LGPL-2.1 only a single c/h
> > file (gtk-exif-util.h) has this license in its copyright header.
> The po files and tests/test-libexif-gtk.c are also licensed under
> LGPL-2.1. I see your point, though. The other files are LGPL-2.
> However, all of those files have "either version 2 of the License, or
> (at your option) any later version" written in them, which would be
> okay.
> Having said that, it may be better to fix d/copyright to account for the
> mixed LGPL-2/2.1 files. What do you think? It's no problem for me to do.
That would be great. TIA.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Reply to: