[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging mmh (fork of nmh)



* Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@gnu.org>, 2016-04-11, 10:06:
So, it is okay to use alternatives to manage /usr/bin/mh symlink (I will need your cooperation, Jakub)

I think you're confusing me with someone else...

, but what about manpages?

Creating alternative for every manpage is too complicated.

It's just a bunch of extra slave links. I doesn't look complicated to me.

Is possible to somehow create subdirectory /usr/share/man/man1/mh and have it availiable to man?

I don't think so.

What you could do is to put the manpages into a different section[0], so that mmh's manpage files don't conflict with nmh's ones. But then it wouldn't be guaranteed that, say, "man mhl" will give the manpage corresponding to /usr/bin/mh/mhl".


[0] nmh manpages use the "mh" suffix after the section number; so you could use the "mmh" suffix.

--
Jakub Wilk


Reply to: