Re: Pseudotransition
Hi,
>I haven't received an answer to the following query. I'd appreciate if
>someone could help me decide whether I need to patch in upstream's
>missing SONAME bump or not.
the package is new, it has never been part of any Debian stable release,
and popcon reports a number ~10.
The answer is the same answer for this question:
do you really think somebody using testing in the last month could had installed
that library and linked a program using the changed symbols?
I would personally avoid an useless soname bump for this particular case.
G.
Reply to: