Hello Gianfranco, On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:15:51PM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > as usual, I don't have any authoritative hat, but people consider a "transition" > something that involves more than 5-10 packages, in this case > > your one seems to be an internal transition, and not worth a transition slot > (specially for haskell stuff, that is a permanent transition). Thank you for your reply. I think I should have just asked the release team whether this would violate the freeze or not. I've e-mailed them. I have another question that is appropriate for -mentors, though: do I need to patch in a SONAME bump? I have now confirmed that libghc-zxcvbn-c-dev, the only package in unstable that depends on libzxcvbn, does not require a binNMU to work with the new version of libzxcvbn. And there has been no stable release containing libzxcvbn, so there are almost certainly no compiled binaries out there which will break. I don't want a delta from upstream if I can avoid it. Is a SONAME bump needed? Thanks. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature