[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#749213: RFS: qtop/2.2.3-2 [ITP]



Hi Andrew,

Thank you for your review !

> I haven't gotten a chance to look at this very deeply yet. 

No problem, it's already very nice to spare time to review this package ! :)
I've also spoken with Axel (Beckert), and he signaled me other bugs. So, the
quality of this package should be better now.  

> A quick look suggests that the License filed in debian/copyright 
> for the upstream files should be GPL-2+ instead of just GPL-2. 

I've updated d/copyright to change it. 

> It also fails to build for me in a clean sid pbuilder:

The build-dependencies were wrong. I had not tried to build the package with
pbuilder ! Now, it builds fine. 

> And finally, you seem to have renamed the binary but not the Exec
> field in the desktop file, so that will be broken.

Added to name.patch. ;)

So... I've made many changes, and, to make clearer, I've written a changelog:

  * d/rules:
    - Deleted all declarations that debhelper 8 needed which are useless
      with debhelper 9.
  * d/control:
    - Changed debhelper required version to 9.0.0.
    - Added new build-dependencies.
  * d/compat:
    - Using compatibility level 9.
  * d/qtop.1:
    - Deleted the paragraph about 'info qtop' which was useless.
  * d/patches/name.patch:
    - Added Top.desktop to the patch.
  * d/copyright:
    - Changed upstream license from GPL-2 to GPL-2+.

Regards, 
 Hugo

-- 
      Hugo Lefeuvre (hugo6390)    |    www.hugo6390.org
4096/ ACB7 B67F 197F 9B32 1533 431C AC90 AC3E C524 065E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: