Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 18/07/12 15:42, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le
> 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
>>>> Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
>>>>> Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> We could agree on a usertag then, for instance:
>>>>
>>>>> User: sponsorship-requests@packages.debian.org Usertags:
>>>>> not-for-wheezy
>>>>
>>>>> Using sponsorship-requests@packages.debian.org as the User,
>>>>> we should be able to rearrange the default view of
>>>>> bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests to have the
>>>>> "for-wheezy" bugs on top (subclassified by severity)
>>>>> followed by the not-for-wheezy bugs.
>
>>> Hi again,
>
>>> I propose two _additional_ tags that could be set independently
>>> from the maintainer: fit-for-wheezy and not-fit-for wheezy.
>>> Those two would be used to show that the package has been
>>> reviewed and is/is not fit for wheezy.
>
> This would be (to me anyway) be very useful. -- if you wouldn't
> mind using "debian-mentors@lists.debian.org" as the user, that'd be
> awesome.
>
> barring considered and correct objection, of course.
Hi,
I think sponsorship-requests@packages.debian.org is better because, as
I understand it, this would allow to show those tags by default and
even to organize the bug list according to those tags.
Regards, Thibaut.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=7LGD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: