On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Le 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > > Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > >> Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi, > > > >> We could agree on a usertag then, for instance: > > > >> User: sponsorship-requests@packages.debian.org Usertags: > >> not-for-wheezy > > > >> Using sponsorship-requests@packages.debian.org as the User, we > >> should be able to rearrange the default view of > >> bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests to have the "for-wheezy" > >> bugs on top (subclassified by severity) followed by the > >> not-for-wheezy bugs. > > > >> cf. http://wiki.debian.org/bugs.debian.org/usertags > > > > Hi, > > > > (For the record, IANADD... yet) > > > > I was about to triage some bugs with these two usertags > > (for-wheezy and not-for-wheezy), but I realized it is impossible to > > do without the assent from the submitter. Actually, I have read the > > first 10 RFSes or so, and if I could, I would not upload any of > > them because they are not fit for wheezy and they don't state > > whether they are aiming for wheezy. > > Hi again, > > I propose two _additional_ tags that could be set independently from > the maintainer: fit-for-wheezy and not-fit-for wheezy. Those two would > be used to show that the package has been reviewed and is/is not fit > for wheezy. For instance if I review a package and it does too much > modifications, I tag it "not-fit-for-wheezy". The maintainer has then > two basic options: > - revert the useless changes, remove the "not-fit-for-wheezy" tag > and add the "for-wheezy" tag; > - tag the package "not-for-wheezy" and/or set distribution to > experimental. > > Unless there are objections, I will start setting the > (not-)fit-for-wheezy usertags tomorrow. > > Reminder: this is to help our sponsors, I can't sponsor myself. If you > don't like the idea, please say so. This would be (to me anyway) be very useful. -- if you wouldn't mind using "debian-mentors@lists.debian.org" as the user, that'd be awesome. barring considered and correct objection, of course. It'd also be nice to automatically set not-fit-for-wheezy uploads to "wishlist" severity (or something) unless they're targeting experimental (in which case, motivation to use that suite!) > > Kind regards, Thibaut. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQBqyTAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAcrQP/A6e0HjgCeX5wKo9Jic3NBJg > EBm/hyYA8upempwqZj3gQGsFqWPTh67SB1WpAK7kZvVDYfDvmGsTol14V7PBDnLy > RqNMMDOU1xPj92eSf3B/nXZaQp0T8r9Jq8iZz0aObraIVgTvhjAzC5u5I+Gur8v7 > zpzHr6YVfuvcrLOfBQ1haE0R3+5gHDEPn57lVz6iijPihsth/WdC5acsVbu7ogjk > oNPkC8B0S8/W7LLCCybW5Ffq/ApMTP//mqzbS2IClP7HGB7TF73pIkw90j33PiH/ > uQsVSDsgcMJrR4HJvSbR0zXfFTnD0a3p3H4e3vROrxIQ/B0koxtGmAGQWfHJlb+5 > 6UgPTCGuj2UhsUfKrGqqVxmGy7JXtHmIVSzw2tUZrg11BwXXWmZnXxVJUg3foukK > 1/XmQNb1sZrxpcFT4EJl7V/f9fPxBBL2r3eayZGIh4CHy7RX1NfDst4EUnZQATdD > Mu9q7EJFIQTuaQ2Ml3xaiM2ftOWOWRYvllQGb47VUMH83/R/Xp0WG6gxWnzNIZTa > 2REUe2n7tS/tgJIH3tBYdKv/M7peF9T6HxOLE7bwwtkAIl1t5OMgxMvwSHxFgw1t > qH62AJh+5g3fGgCReBM+XGVSwKojnUSCYcUYDoEtRumbCNbIX/sdSR1Y5jTRyiJn > YrMiZ5X57azs5qaapAMG > =x6tG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > Archive: [🔎] 5006AC94.6090406@users.sourceforge.net">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 5006AC94.6090406@users.sourceforge.net > Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature