Re: RFS: django-autoslug
Hi,
I you meant to imply that all Django packages are violating Python
Policy 2.2, then this is not true[0]. It is true, however that most of
them are named incorrectly, and I'm partially responsible for that,
being a sponsor of a few of them.
That said, I won't sponsor any new packages violating 2.2. (You are of
course free to find another sponsor.)
which is quite usefull for the user.
I don't see how python-django-$FOO is more useful than python-$FOO.
Surely the latter is easier to type. ;)
Ok, I don't 100% agree but I get your point, I renamed the package to
python-autoslug, so it's now :
http://mentors.debian.net/package/django-autoslug
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/django-autoslug/django-autoslug_1.4.1-1.dsc
Now please honour DEB_BUILD_OPTION=nocheck. :)
Done
It's some kind of brain damage of mentors.d.n software. Please ignore it.
ok ;)
Do you see any other issues with this package ?
It would be probably worthwhile to explain the long description what a
"slug field" is. I had to look it up in the documentation, even though
I've been using Django for a few years.
Done
If lintian was a bit smarter, it would trigger
possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description on your package.
Done, anything else ?
Thanks for your feedback Jakub :), regards,
--
Jocelyn Delalande
Blog (fr) http://hackriculture.fr
Home http://crapouillou.net/~jocelyn
IRC JocelynD /OFTC
Reply to: