RFS: gnome-shell-extensions
Dear mentors and Gnome maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for gnome-shell-extensions. The source is
accessible at [0] and the binaries on [1]. As you can see on [2] I
already have been helping maintaining other packages.
The idea is to integrate the package in the gnome vcs if you think it
deserves to be included in Debian.
Source: gnome-shell-extensions
Version: 3.0.2-1
Architecture: all
Maintainer: Victor Seva <linuxmaniac@torreviejawireless.org>
Section: gnome
Priority: optional
Homepage: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Extensions
Description: Extensions to extend functionality of GNOME Shell (common files)
The GNOME Shell redefines user interactions with the GNOME desktop. In
particular, it offers new paradigms for launching applications,
accessing documents, and organising open windows in GNOME. Later, it
will introduce a new applets eco-system and offer new solutions for
other desktop features, such as notifications and contacts management.
The GNOME Shell is intended to replace functions handled by the GNOME
Panel and by the window manager in previous versions of GNOME. The GNOME
Shell has rich visual effects enabled by new graphical technologies.
.
GNOME Shell is extensible using extensions. The gnome-shell-extensions-*
packages contain official GNOME Shell extensions.
gnome-shell-extensions (3.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #627515)
Package based in the work by Bilal Akhtar <bilalakhtar@ubuntu.com>
* debian/copyright
Added myself
Fixed syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright syntax error
* debian/control.in
Added myself as maintainer.
Fix gnome-shell dependency
* debian/rules
Added uploaders.mk gnome-version.mk includes
* debian/watch added.
-- Victor Seva <linuxmaniac@torreviejawireless.org> Sun, 30 Oct 2011
19:47:57 +0100
Thanks in advance.
[0] https://github.com/linuxmaniac/pkg_gnome-shell-extensions
[1] http://linuxmaniac.torreviejawireless.org/debian/gnome-shell-extensions/
[2] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=linuxmaniac%40torreviejawireless.org
Reply to: