Re: RFS: dbxml
Am 30.07.2011 um 12:56 schrieb Daniel de Kok <email@example.com>:
> Thanks for the feedback! One question:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Kilian Krause <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Apart from that I only would prefer to have a -1 without a patch for the
>> initial upload so that I won't have to "repackage" your upload to make it
>> fit for putting into the archive.
> Without patches, dbxml does not build (it will not find db5.1), so how
> do I proceed here?
Ah, I see. Name that patch correctly then and put a DEP-3 header.