Re: bt747: doubts on licenses and embedded libraries
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica,
On 15.05.2011 13:40, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> So, thinking in DEP5: If I choose GPL-3.0+, what should I write in the
> description of the license? (Suppose I have the GPL-3.0+ already
> detailed):
The GPL paragraph I cited does not mean "re-license it for whatever GPL
version you want", but "The author doesn't care. His licensed work is
compatible to every GPL version (or GPL compatible licenses) you want to
choose for derivate works".
This means for you, you can keep things as they are, just give no
version in DEP-5 for the sections where this applies for your upstream
source. Remaining parts (if any) can be licensed to whatever is
compatible to any GPL version.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=iUf4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: