Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit : > Again, no need to CC me :) > > > Oh yes, i did not see the second patch (I'm not sure how it appear, > > maybe when i was playing with quilt). > > According to the patch header, it has been created by dpkg-source. I > can't remember the exact process, though. > > > Well, there is only one option: -skin, I'll put it in the man page. > > But the upstream comes with other documentation than two README files > > that overlap. I will figure what to do with that. Might be an upstream > > issue too. > > Documenting this and give a pointer to the full documentation may be > enough. > > > > - Probably an upstream issue, but I find it confusing to ship two > > > binaries that differ only in the way they interpret numbers. IMHO > > > that should be a command-line switch or a menu option. > > > > I've looked quickly to the sources, move that 'option' into a switch > > will be a very big patch, but i think debian have a solution for that. > > May be i can build two packages, and use update-alternatives to handle > > that problem. Is that an acceptable solution for you ? > > Alternatives makes sense when two packages provides the same service. > With free42, different users may use different settings (or, a user > may use different settings). Building two executables is fine. You can > even have a single manpage (see for example grep, egrep, rgrep). Hi, I've fixed the man (and doc), and tuned the Makefile patch. Can you have a look please ? Jean. -- Jean Schurger http://schurger.org GPG: http://schurger.org/jean.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part