[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: esekeyd and triggerhappy (Re: RFS: triggerhappy)

Dies schrieb Jonathan Nieder (jrnieder@gmail.com):

> This information could be useful for both package descriptions.
> (Maybe, for triggerhappy:
> 	That is, this is similar to esekeyd but it also supports
> 	<such and such>, allowing you to <such and such>.
> and for esekeyd:
> 	This package does not do <such and such>; for that, see
> 	triggerhappy.  In the simple situations it does handle,
> 	esekeyd is {simpler to configure | compatible with the
> 	old funkey daemon | more conservative in its use of
> 	resources | providing a different interface that existing
> 	users might be used to | whatever}.

OK, I don't know esekeyd enough to include it into a direct comparison, but I
tweaked my package description to better reflect the main aspects of
triggerhappy and its features.

Reply to: