Re: RFS: mosquitto
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: RFS: mosquitto
- From: Roger Light <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:04:54 +0000
- Message-id: <AANLkTiko2+wri5p_axae_=P+6ir=ZD0yESYkG6J7pZRN@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=wvekpHfY43_DB0-mqH3GRVkShB0hOY+64YStG@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTi=A-ACSXb3MGFNAttVEqmx+c_GLTyBM+bKGqw5y@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinQ-+3zdwYxkxMxbEnyXHFZ8pXUkwnn=YD6rub0@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=wvekpHfY43_DB0-mqH3GRVkShB0hOY+64YStG@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the pointers.
> You have one wishlist lintian issue ( try running with -iIE --pedantic )
> I: mosquitto source: duplicate-long-description libmosquitto0 libmosquitto0-dev
> I: mosquitto source: duplicate-long-description libmosquittopp0
I've fixed these.
> I'm not sure about the binary packages:
> I don't know if you can have underscores. Might want to change those
> to dashes.
Ah, I just changed those two packages from being a combined single
package. Names are now fixed.
> Might want to add DEP3 headers to the patches and change
> the Copyright to DEP5 while you're in there as well.
Done and done.
I've re-uploaded the changes.
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided
> if "debian/libmosquittopp0/usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0" were not
> uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
I don't know how to fix this. Any suggestions?