Re: Re: RFS: synergy-plus (a fork of synergy which is maintained)
On 24 June 2010 02:21, Paul Wise <email@example.com> wrote:
> Looks like your takeover request rejection was simply a communications
> issue. I think the best approach is to get synergy2.sf.net maintained
> again and merge everything from code.g.c/p/synergy-plus into synergy,
> then shut down synergy-plus. Ultimately this is the best outcome for
> the FLOSS community and is suggested by Debian Social Contract point
I fully agree. I'm currently discussing this with Chris S. Details will follow.