[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: acetoneiso



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nick Andrik schrieb:
> 
> O/H Patrick Matthäi έγραψε:
>> Nick Andrik schrieb:
>>> O/H Patrick Matthäi ­³Á±Èµ:
>>>> Am 13.01.2010 20:01, schrieb Nick Andrik:
>>>>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>>>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acetoneiso
>>>>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>>>>> main contrib non-free
>>>>> - dget
>>>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acetoneiso/acetoneiso_2.2.1-1.dsc
>>>>>
>>>> I have spotted another problem. The source is GPLv3+ but in your
>>>> debian/copyright you have included the header of the GPLv3 license
>>>> (which does not include the "or any later version" statement).
>>> It should be ok now, thanks for pointing it out.
>> Thanks, uploaded.
> 
> May I ask something? From the mails I received it seems that the changes
> file uploaded was the amd64 one. Shouldn't it be the source file and
> targeting all architectures?
> 
> Sorry,  if I missed something in the whole procedure but it is my first
> package that gets sponsored and I don't know exactly how the whole
> things works exactly.

If I sponsor a package from you, you give me the source, I will check
and build it. If everything is fine, I am uploading the source with my
builded binarys.

If you package is accepted from ftp-masters (now it is in the NEW queue,
because it is binary/source new) the buildd network will build your
package on all other architectures and upload them to the archive.

- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
 Patrick Matthäi
 GNU/Linux Debian Developer

E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
        patrick@linux-dev.org

Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktPg7QACgkQ2XA5inpabMffYgCgqEvCmSpTSJPjoDiHIzmV9BFX
mqQAnRKNvXPPHUy4kIhYgfsDZO2kxPkl
=OcUN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: