Re: RFS: concordance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb:
> Patrick,
>
> The package has been re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net; please see
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Patrick Matthäi<pmatthaei@debian.org> wrote:
> I just re-read the policy, and it looks to me like it's okay;
> following point 2.3, and also looking very much like the pyenchant
> example from the http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy page.
Right.
>
> In any case, I applied the changes you proposed: changed Architecture
> to all for python-concordance, and I added all the tasks under
> binary-indep.
Yes, but too many.
Please explain e.g. *very* short why dh_strip e.g. is useless in
binary-indep.
Also dh_{link,installman} at all and dh_{pycentral,install} are not
needed in rules.
Also you made a new error. Now the package is not binNMU safe. You can
not prop. binary:Depend from an arch:all package to another one. Use
source:Version.
>
> I updated the package again. It's lintian-clean for the
> _source.changes, and the only error in lintian from the binary
> packages is still the lack of a symbols file.
>
> I: libconcord1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libconcord.so.1.0.0
>
> Is fixing this as simple as adding 'dpkg-gensymbols -plibconcord1'
> somewhere in my 'debian/rules' file? The library packaging guide is a
> little unclear to me, and so is the manpage for dpkg-gensymbols.
Personaly I am also not maining symbols files, because of the bad
handling of FTBFS on arches where they may diff ;)
It is not a need for me currently.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
patrick@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkopYIAACgkQ2XA5inpabMdluQCdFhFYAysYcrFfLOmVLnJ9lToZ
uYoAmQFj+0DTChioPNAzLl5S9jgj86eG
=QvHt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: