Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.1+lenny1 (Lenny security bug fixes)

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.1+lenny1 (Lenny security bug fixes)
From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:45:13 +0200
Message-id: <20090829124513.GA5629@piotro.eu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-python@lists.debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <87vdk79vai.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <87vdk79vai.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

[Ben Finney, 2009-08-29]
> <URL:http://pastebin.ca/1546649>

uh, package in Lenny is in bad shape. I uploaded it with 2 additional
changes (Architecture changed to all and debian/conffiles removed)
and I was tempted to fix a lot more issues in there...

thanks Ben
-- 
-=[     Piotr Ożarowski     ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.1+lenny1 (Lenny security bug fixes)
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

References:
- RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.1+lenny1 (Lenny security bug fixes)
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Any "efficient" way to specify target arches?
Next by Date: Re: Any "efficient" way to specify target arches?
Previous by thread: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.1+lenny1 (Lenny security bug fixes)
Next by thread: Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.1+lenny1 (Lenny security bug fixes)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread