On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:36 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> Thanks, all in all, that was a better take on why separate patching
> should be done. I'll take a look at topgit (and quilt, too) and will
> probably rebuild the package.
OK, I've updated my package, here's 0.8.0-3's changelog:
opendchub (0.8.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Use TopGit and Quilt to manage patches
* Re-add debian/patches, with diffs autogenerated from git branches
* Add debian/README.source describing the package build
And here's the diffstat:
NEWS | 20 ++++
README.Debian | 37 +++++++
README.source | 34 ++++++
changelog | 151
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
compat | 1
config.default | 62 ++++++++++++
control | 41 ++++++++
copyright | 33 ++++++
docs | 2
init | 58 +++++++++++
manpages | 1
motd.default | 3
opendchub.1 | 71 ++++++++++++++
patches/bugs/495063.diff | 58 +++++++++++
patches/fixes/avoid-buffer-overflow.diff | 29 +++++
patches/series | 2
postinst | 85 +++++++++++++++++
postrm | 20 ++++
rules | 30 ++++++
watch | 4
20 files changed, 742 insertions(+)
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendchub/opendchub_0.8.0-3.dsc
--
Zak B. Elep -- 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
I like the idea of 256 bits, though: 32 for the (Unicode) character
leaves room for 224 Bucky bits, which ought to be enough for anyone.
-- Roland Hutchinson, in alt.folklore.computers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part