On 09/05/28 17:17 -0700, Russ Allbery said ... > Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <appaji@debian.org> writes: > > > I am not sure if enforcing "extra" in cases other than conflicts, > > Depends: on lower priority and very clear specialised requirements > > (elinks-lite, debug symbols etc.) gains us much. > > Oh, yes, I agree. I wouldn't go to people in general and ask them to > make their packages priority: extra. I was only questioning because > you'd said to raise the priority from extra to optional, and this didn't > seem like a package where we'd want to make a special effort to move it > into optional. Ah, I tend to use "optional unless _really_ extra based on the above definition" rule. And I am not particular that the OP _must_ change the package priority to extra (if that is a conscious decision), however, the section "devel" is inappropriate (and looks like Rich did not modify the dh_make templates appropriately). Regards, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://people.debian.org/~appaji/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature