Re: RFS: sphinxsearch

[Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>]

Jérémy Lal <jerry@edagames.com> writes:

> W: sphinxsearch: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/indexer
> W: sphinxsearch: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/search
> W: sphinxsearch: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/searchd
> W: sphinxsearch: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/spelldump

These command names are rather too generic. Perhaps they should be
prefixed with ‘sphinx-’?

> E: sphinxsearch: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/etc/
> W: sphinxsearch: file-in-unusual-dir usr/etc/example.sql
> W: sphinxsearch: file-in-unusual-dir usr/etc/sphinx-min.conf.dist
> W: sphinxsearch: file-in-unusual-dir usr/etc/sphinx.conf.dist
> W: sphinxsearch: non-standard-dir-in-usr usr/var/

These all look like installing the package with the wrong options to
‘configure’, but that's a guess.

> W: sphinxsearch: readme-debian-contains-debmake-template

Either write something useful in the README.Debian, or remove it if it's
not needed for the package.

> W: sphinxsearch: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate
> W: sphinxsearch: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate
> W: sphinxsearch: new-package-should-close-itp-bug

Perhaps Lintian was never run on this package before uploading it?

-- 
 \          “All good things are cheap; all bad are very dear.” —Henry |
  `\                                                     David Thoreau |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney