Re: RFS: sphinxsearch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Ben Finney wrote:
> Jérémy Lal <email@example.com> writes:
> These command names are rather too generic. Perhaps they should be
> prefixed with ‘sphinx-’?
> These all look like installing the package with the wrong options to
> ‘configure’, but that's a guess.
> Either write something useful in the README.Debian, or remove it if it's
> not needed for the package.
> Perhaps Lintian was never run on this package before uploading it?
This has now been re-uploaded. The manpages don't exist, and as there is
no ITP bug, it can't close it, so those warnings remain. Apart from that
it appears to me to be clean.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----