Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Hai Zaar <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
> All done:
> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
> is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
> etc.) as soon we'll done polishing Debian part.
> 2. Yes, since package arch independent, and after reading
> autotools-dev documentation, I see that its indeed should not be
> required, so current package builds without it.
> Thank you,
P.S. The package were reuploaded.