Re: RFS (take 2): libbash
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
etc.) as soon we'll done polishing Debian part.
2. Yes, since package arch independent, and after reading
autotools-dev documentation, I see that its indeed should not be
required, so current package builds without it.