[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ozerocdoff



Hi Didier,

Le mercredi 15 avril 2009 à 11:27 +0200, Didier Raboud a écrit :
> Julien Valroff wrote:
> 
> >> Maybe there is another one further down. Also, lintian warns:
> >> 
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >> I: ozerocdoff source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
> >> P: ozerocdoff source: source-contains-prebuilt-binary ozerocdoff.o
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > 
> > Grr I don't understand what I have done as I had to repack the sources to
> > remove this binary.
> > I do not understand neither why I wasn't warned by lintian on my build
> > machine (I used svn-buildpackage -svn-lintian which gave no error nor
> > warning!)
> 
> Hi Julien,
> 
> note that usb-modeswitch (the concurrent ;) ) also provides a prebuilt
> binary in the tarball and that the lintian warning is a "pedantic" one.

Yes, that's right, that's why I haven't been warned by svn-lintian
I hadn't paid attention to this when reading Rogério's message.

> I just overwrite this prebuilt binary in the building process. It voids the
> need for a orig.source repack.

Well, I actually prefer repacking (that was my aim but just not uploaded
the right orig.tar.gz to mentors.d.n yesterday)

By the way, don't you think usb-modeswitch and ozerocdoff should
conflict? Though they do not share files, they could cause issues when
installed together - I haven't tested though as usb-modeswitch doesn't
work with my hardware.

Cheers,
Julien

-- 
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

Rejoignez maintenant plus de 4 500 personnes, associations, entreprises
et collectivités qui soutiennent notre action


Reply to: