On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:16:51PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Hi, i just forward that message to you, since i just sent it to debian-mentors list. > By the way what's the default behavior on debian-mentors ? cc or not cc ? ah, sorry, I missed it ... I've been busy the last few days. >> They aren't redmine plugins, but rails plugins that redmine requires. >> okay, I'll work on those next week and next weekend. >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan > > Ok, i get it. > indeed there are plugins in vendor/plugins, > but i fear that you can't really put them apart from redmine : > i asked JP Lang (upstream developer) about that, and he answers > most if not all plugins that are in the redmine svn have been > modified and redmine heavily depends on them. > hmm. ok, I understand...my own rails apps do that as well, sadly. > To clear things up, i think we should separate plugins in two sets : > - redmine only plugins : those are not on rubyforge, seems to have > been made by redmine developers. > - packageable plugins : available on rubyforge, there's a good chance some > other rails apps would depend on them. > > Anyway, i'm not a rails developer and don't really know how plugins > are used : is it common practice to fork them ? > May be some "important" plugins are worth a package, maybe some small > ones should be packaged with the app using them, as in the redmine's case. > well, I guess you can try just leaving them all in vendor/plugins/ and seeing what people say...:) has anybody replied to your request to join DRE yet? > Regards, > > Jérémy Lal > > > > > -- _________________________ Ryan Niebur ryanryan52@gmail.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature