Hello, On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, I wrote: > I've been trying to write a watch file for "flpsed". First of all sorry for hijacking the thread. Secondly, it is amazing how writing down one's problem makes it clear how to solve it! > As far as I can see the author's logic for this somewhat bizarre > numbering is the hope that by the time 0.5.x needs enough revisions > to cross 0.6, everyone will be using fltk2.x anyway. Given this logic, I suppose the natural choice for the watch file would be to use 0.5.* as the pattern that needs to be matched! Thanks anyway. Regards, Kapil. --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature