[Mauro Lizaur, 11.02.2008] > may i ask which was the lintian error? i executed lintan -i -I and it > was clean :/ it was about missing python package in Build-Depends (a bug in lintian - fixed already) > All the changes you made are fine for me, there are only two thing > that i would change: > - the url in the homepage field, shouldn't be there the project url? I moved one of the links from long description to this field (apparently wrong one) > - instead of using 'cp' to install the examples, i'll use 'install -m 755' install is better, yes (it was cp before my changes, I only updated paths) > - I got this 'linda' warning: > W: python-twitter; 3.7.3 is a newer Standards-Version. > but the value on the Standards-Version field in the debian/control is 3.7.3 ignore it > - When i built the package using -S -sa i got a 'lintian' warning > about not having a Description field on the .changes file(which is > true), but when i built this very same package not using pbuilder i > got no warnings and the Description field appears on the .changes > file. cannot reproduce it with `dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa`, I'm not building source only packages though, so you can ignore this one as well > - And last but not least, may be both manpages could be improved a > little bit more, i'll wait for your opinion about them. looks good One more thing before I upload it: please clarify copyright holder issue - the one in sources and in debian/copyright doesn't match (a hint: I was checking 3 other packages before yours today, join DPMT and your packages will get automatically a higher priority :) -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor.txt
Attachment:
pgpDeBYGdPH50.pgp
Description: PGP signature