Hello, there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright. Yours sincerely, Ferdinand ------------------------ Format-Specification: http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat?action=recall&rev=226 Upstream-Name: tmux Upstream-Maintainer: Karl Ferdinand Ebert <firstname.lastname@example.org> Upstream-Source: http://sf.net/projects/tmux Upstream Author: Nicholas Marriott <email@example.com> Files: * Copyright: Copyright (c) 2007 Nicholas Marriott <firstname.lastname@example.org> License: BSD-2 Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF MIND, USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. Files: debian/* Copyright: Copyright 2008, Karl Ferdinand Ebert <email@example.com> License: GPL-3+ On Debian systems the full text of the GNU General Public License can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL' file. ---------------------- Am Monday 15 September 2008 22:03:25 schrieb George Danchev: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 14:20:24 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi, > > > thanks a lot in advantage. I have provided a corrected line in control > > for "Depends:" (how silly I forgot that) and rewritten the short and long > > description (taken from the first paragraph of the manpage). Moreover I > > added the wanted watch file. I am quiet not sure about the final form of > > my changed copyright file, perhaps you could give further advice. > > This format is not mandatory yet, but it is good to provide it: > http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat > the simple example will suffice in that case. > > I'm still not sure if we need alternative to screen, which seems to be the > only one terminal multiplexor currently found in Debian. OTOH, a sane > number of alternatives is a good think (helps competition, avoids vendor > lockups;-), and tmux seems to be a very clean piece of code. Perhaps, > someone else would like to provide some comments on that ? > > -- > pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.