Re: RFS: tmux
On Sunday 14 September 2008 14:20:24 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> thanks a lot in advantage. I have provided a corrected line in control
> for "Depends:" (how silly I forgot that) and rewritten the short and long
> description (taken from the first paragraph of the manpage). Moreover I
> added the wanted watch file. I am quiet not sure about the final form of my
> changed copyright file, perhaps you could give further advice.
This format is not mandatory yet, but it is good to provide it:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
the simple example will suffice in that case.
I'm still not sure if we need alternative to screen, which seems to be the
only one terminal multiplexor currently found in Debian. OTOH, a sane number
of alternatives is a good think (helps competition, avoids vendor lockups;-),
and tmux seems to be a very clean piece of code. Perhaps, someone else would
like to provide some comments on that ?
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
Reply to: