[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: tmux


thanks a lot in advantage. I have provided a corrected line in control 
for "Depends:" (how silly I forgot that) and rewritten the short and long 
description (taken from the first paragraph of the manpage). Moreover I added 
the wanted watch file. I am quiet not sure about the final form of my changed 
copyright file, perhaps you could give further advice. 

Yours sincerely,


Am Saturday 13 September 2008 22:03:01 schrieb George Dan
> On Friday 12 September 2008 13:03:20 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tmux".
> Hello,
> 	Package looks good to me, provided the following:
> * control: your Depends line is empty, but your package depends on
> libncurses5 (at least) run-time. You want Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} in
> order to give a chance to dh_shlibdeps (resp. dpkg-shlibdeps) to populate
> that entry correctly for you.
> * control: improving the long description would also help, since now I'm
> not convinced that tmux is better than screen, or it is just YA (yet
> another) 'terminal multiplexer'. Put some salt in there, like what is
> different or better with tmux and why it is needed, no gambling of course,
> since the code is there ;-), which also looks very clean to me.
> * copyright: machine interpretable copyright format would also be nice (ask
> wiki.debian.org about it)
> * adding a watch file would be nice.
> --
> pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: